
THAT MEANS THEIR OPINION IS INVALID, LIKE GALILEO'S.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:47, Reply)

if you think there might be spriat worlds why no middle earth, why not faires down the garden, why not wizards hiding in the malyan jungle. why dont we test all these things based on your veiw on scince we should.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:51, Reply)

im saying that if we as a soceity are to accept teh testing of relgious beilfs as a valid use of resorcses why limit to relgious beilfs and not allthings with as much grounding as relgious beilfs, like all the other stuff which is made up
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:02, Reply)

Some might refuse to admit it, but we can put that down to cognitive dissonance.
Does this mean there is an afterlife? maybe. I don't think that's what the study is trying to prove.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:25, Reply)