If someone has a theory and they want to test it in real life
then that is what we call SCIENCE.
If they get proven wrong, then well done, now we know.
If it can't be proven either way, it isn't science and as such shouldn't be argued about. That would be pointless.
Did you read the article?
"this is a mystery that we can now subject to scientific study"
So if it turns out to be wrong, they get to shut the fuck up.
THIS IS HOW SCIENCE WORKS.
Do you understand what the scientific method is? It's great, you should look into it.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:56, Share, Reply)
then that is what we call SCIENCE.
If they get proven wrong, then well done, now we know.
If it can't be proven either way, it isn't science and as such shouldn't be argued about. That would be pointless.
Did you read the article?
"this is a mystery that we can now subject to scientific study"
So if it turns out to be wrong, they get to shut the fuck up.
THIS IS HOW SCIENCE WORKS.
Do you understand what the scientific method is? It's great, you should look into it.
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 13:56, Share, Reply)
im not questiong wether its a scintific exsperiment
im questionig the basis for the beilf that the theory has a resanble exspectation of being true. its not a scintific theory there are such things as scintific thereis im questiong wehter or not the after life is one
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:05, Share, Reply)
im questionig the basis for the beilf that the theory has a resanble exspectation of being true. its not a scintific theory there are such things as scintific thereis im questiong wehter or not the after life is one
( , Thu 18 Sep 2008, 14:05, Share, Reply)