accepting all of the nice positive comments but anything slightly negative has got rejected. Fucking arsebags
(, Fri 14 Nov 2008, 9:53, Reply)
i mean it seriously too, journalists should never be able to cherry pick the responses they get, it's just escaping from the fact they may be worn from time to time.
fuck that makes me siock. i gave a fully thought out appraisal of his article, perfectly articulated and puntctuated. granted, it was critical, but just as worthy as positive comment. but that gets nowhere near his comments section, instead we get this shit:
"Richard, please, please apply for the PM job. You're the only one left with enough common sense to fix this country from its rottenness."
- jamie, Jakarta, Indonesia, 14/11/2008 04:18
WHAT THE FUCK?!
(, Fri 14 Nov 2008, 10:00, Reply)
Fuck I didn't see that one, that's terrible. As well written as the article is, it's clearly laced with bullshit. Considering he walked past this family eating chips, he managed to stare at them long enough to pick out intricate details about them, none of which I believe, other than eating chips. He probably just got shitty and up himself because he had to step off the pavement! oh fucking dear! Shit happens, I walk off the pavemennt intentionally for most people, it's called manners, something which he thinks he has so much of, being of "breeding" and intelligence, but it's quite obvious he is just a stuck up prick.
I judged his own article with the same predjudice attitude that he opens it with, by only reading the first few paragraphs and deciding to wing the rest with my own imagination.
(, Fri 14 Nov 2008, 10:04, Reply)
i've read him too many times when he was in the sun (i blame this wholeheartedly on my housemate, i'm an independent or grauniad myself) and it's always horrible horrible hateful digusting shit that has no base in reality in the slightest.
(, Fri 14 Nov 2008, 10:11, Reply)