"Justice Michael Adams said the purpose of anti-child pornography legislation was to stop sexual exploitation and child abuse where images of "real" children were depicted."
I agree. The harm isn't being done when someone looks at the picture... but if they are fuelling a demand for the production of the pictures, that is when young lives are damaged.
In the case of looking at cartoon porn, sick as it might be, no-one is hurt in producing it, therefore where is the crime?
(
Mr Gear the gay-maker, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 17:12,
Reply)
i guess
that the argument would be that any porn with kids in, real or not, to some extent legitimises the paedos position and makes the filthy devil more likely to beast kids...
thats not my argument...
but for balance...
(
tickle I was away, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 17:36,
Reply)
its fucked up and the people that like it are too?
come on man... seriously...
(, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 18:24, Reply)