Nope.
Prisonplanet - not the most reliable source in the world - has quoted a photography magazine. Woo hoo.
There's nothing in the Act that says what you say it does.
Here's a cut-and-paste job from sec 76, which seems to be the closes to what you're rabbiting on about:
76 Offences relating to information about members of armed forces etc
(1)After section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (collection of information) insert—
“58AEliciting, publishing or communicating information about members of armed forces etc
(1)A person commits an offence who—
(a)elicits or attempts to elicit information about an individual who is or has been—
(i)a member of Her Majesty’s forces,
(ii)a member of any of the intelligence services, or
(iii)a constable,which is of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism, or
(b)publishes or communicates any such information.
(2)It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to prove that they had a reasonable excuse for their action.
Not nearly what you claim.
Again.
(
Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 19:18,
Reply)