Edit: Actually you aren't making much sense matey
"Yes it is, that's why they're treated differently by the law. Something to do with not being a mature grown up yet."
Unfortunately he posted his video on the internet, to the public. So now what? We all don't say anything or express our revulsion at his actions because he is a child? We aren't allowed to identify him to try and prevent him from further abuse of an animal? That's the problem with the internet, people think they are anonymous, when actually they aren't that much. To bad he was a child, but the target of his abuse is now safe because of a lynch mob mentality, and their problems can be assessed and addressed by a Doctor
You seem very worked up and angry about everyone being hypocrites; most of us don't find bashing our pets against walls entertaining or funny; so I don't understand where you are coming from.
Personally I don't approve of some cooking methods, but that's called food preparation, not perverted humor; if that's an excuse anybody could reply with.
(, Mon 16 Feb 2009, 20:24, Reply)
That's how it is, and rightly so.
It's fine to be upset by the video. I was too, from the few seconds I watched. To wish any sort of harm on the child is hypocrisy. You either want to see things get harmed or you don't. There's no picking and choosing.
(, Mon 16 Feb 2009, 20:46, Reply)
...and many others here, have not expressed any desire to see the child suffer, merely be made aware of the consequences of his actions and taught that this is not an appropriate way to behave.
There's no hipocrisy in that.
but I'll grant you, it seems many people would like to see him beaten
(, Mon 16 Feb 2009, 21:31, Reply)