Things I already know:
- she is fat
- she is stupid (although the people around her clearly arent)
- she is dying of cancer
- she is one of the luckiest fuckers alive since she has fame for largely being an objectionable human being (he forgot to mention that she's also a bigot)
I do not find any of these things particularly endearing.
Things I have learnt from this video:
- Joe from "fit lads" (whatever that is) would not wish cancer on himself
- He doesnt like the fact that someone who genuinely has days left on the planet is willing to use her fame (ill gotten as it is) to set her children up for life. I wonder what you or I would do in the same situation (perhaps something similar in better taste).
- he thinks that other people's "personal tragedies" are somehow weakened by her plight. A connection I do not understand - Jade Goody has not deprived these people of medicine any more than the next cancer sufferer. If anything there has been a minor stimulation in public debate about cervical cancer
- he thinks that political correctness, some types of coffee, vegetarianism and voting Labour are all bad things - that these things are somehow connected and that this invented social group should "fuck off"
I wish I had a video camera...
(, Mon 23 Feb 2009, 10:24, Reply)
But I still think the whole 'use fatal disease as publicity-stunt' is just terrible.
And I challenge you to prove that a) she meant it entirely for her kids and not for herself in the usual jade goody fashion and b)regardless of her celebrity status she was treated as just another cancer patient in terms of care and medication
(, Mon 23 Feb 2009, 10:39, Reply)
a) she has an aggressive cancer and at best has 2 months to live. Even if she had the energy to spend it all on herself, I imagine she wouldn't. I don't think even the stupidest of human beings would be capable of such behaviour.
b) I'm not sure of the particulars here but in her shoes (and with money accrued previously) I'd definitley go private. Anybody can purchase private healthcare insurance as long as they have the money to do so. It doesnt require celebrity.
(, Mon 23 Feb 2009, 10:48, Reply)
NHS: six weeks.
Private: three hours.
Thankfully I have insurance through work.
(, Mon 23 Feb 2009, 11:37, Reply)
and you can barely walk, is probably loads of fun.
Not that I like her, but I can understand what she is doing. What would you do differently? GO and die quietly, without making much of a fuss and leaving fuck all, except a bad reputation for your kids to grow up under, or would you think, fuck it, and make some money for them?
I don't know why people get so pissed off about it all, other than petty jealousy that she is getting wads of cash for doing fuck all, which, to be honest, anyone in their right mind would think is a great deal. Would you turn down a photo opportunity for a million to show your last days? Don't think so
(, Mon 23 Feb 2009, 10:51, Reply)
she's not actually doing all of this for the sake of cancer sufferers.
As far as I'm aware it just seems that she's coming accross as the only person who's afflicted with this and wants others to know.
Yes, I agree that suffering from cancer whilst being a celebrity is going to have the side-effect of nationwide attention...
But surely a little decorm. You're talking about a photo op, she's gunning for the whole publicity package here. Surely you're not saying that's kosher?
(, Mon 23 Feb 2009, 11:08, Reply)