
So after all the pseudo-legal bollocks, the liability order was granted so the guy either pays up or the bailiffs will impound his gear and sell it to pay the council tax bill. So being "A Freeman On The Land" achieved the square-root of fuck all.
Simple minded buffoons.
Cheers
( , Mon 21 Jun 2010, 9:55, Reply)

I figured that, if it was as important as he claimed, it'd've generated a fair bit of legal and academic commentary. So I did a quick search of a century's worth of journals...
... and came up with nothing.
This suggests one of two possibilities. First, the conspiracy is so deep that every legal practitioner, legal academic, moral and political philosopher and political theorist of the last hundred years has been silenced on the topic, and the only people who know the truth and are willing to do anything about it are internet warriors. Second, there's nothing to say, because the whole thing is nonsense. I wonder which is the more likely...
( , Mon 21 Jun 2010, 10:04, Reply)

the bollocks-ness of it I thought was made particularly plain by the fact they couldn't get anyone other than one of their own conspiraloons to represent them!
( , Mon 21 Jun 2010, 10:08, Reply)