?
rights are not rights if others decide when you can have them and when you can't, If you do nothing unlawful
also if your ex turned up at your wedding, if he did nothing unlawful he could not be arrested. your suspition would not be grounds enough. If there was an injunction and proof of previous then it would be different. But to arrest purely on the thought of someone deciding they 'may' commit a crime is called the abuse of power. The implications are staggering.
(, Sat 30 Apr 2011, 12:53, Reply)
I agree with you,
and yet supposing a man was in my garden at 3am in dark clothing with a sack and a screwdriver. None of these are actual crimes. 'Going equipped' is a pretty catch all thing when you think about it, but surely he would be arrested for conspiracy to rob or going equipped. I'm just saying it isn't black and white.
As to my wedding, it would be obvious that there would be trouble; there is history but no injunction. So the police could a) arrest him the day before on suspicion of intent; b) attend the wedding to prevent anything or c) wiat to see if it kicks off then make 7 arrests and deal with the ambulances.
a) may not be the most moral course, but the most sensible, surely?
(
TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?, Sat 30 Apr 2011, 13:39,
Reply)
I'm with you on this one
www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/the-rights-of-suspects/stop-and-search/reasonable-grounds-for-suspicion.html
(
maiden is filmed before a live studio audience, Sat 30 Apr 2011, 13:55,
Reply)