I thought that was quite a good discussion, considering,
I don't see why all TV discussions have to be heated and the presenter's job seems to be to rush everyone along and make their conclusions for them before they've finished speaking tho, it annoys me, you've got these people on to make their points, how bout you let them, ffs...
*edit* Also, nobody mentioned half the reason why newspapers' sales figures are down are 'cos the internet is essentially taking away the whole bloody point of them, you're always reading yesterday's news, but I do agree there's plenty of ways of being entertaining without having to be purile or scaring people, if they were banned from destroying people by making stuff up or peeping thru curtains they'd be forced to be more creative, they're only going for the base purile nasty shit just because it's easier and sells, and you also have to remember, it sells because a lot of people want to read it, change the clientele's attitude to themselves and you destroy them that way!
(
..wil, Fri 14 Oct 2011, 8:05,
Reply)
That gets to me too
They don't seem to know the difference between really skewering a politician on an awkward point and just interupting someone before they've answered the question they were asked.
(
Sheriff John Bunnell https://twitter.com/thewonderfulgam, Fri 14 Oct 2011, 8:10,
Reply)