b3ta.com links
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 825918 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post Well of course he was, he was a hard man with a gun who shot bad people
But they didn't smear the screen with blood and have giblets flying thru the air, the point of reading it wasn't for the gore wank and macho chest thumping, it was for the story, cool shit and pleasing boy hood morals, the good guy always won and all that.

This looks like its going to be half the story and twice the gore, nice and easy money off the 300 style crowd, I wonder if they'll throw in some confusingly homo erotic chest out male bonding scenes too, they all seem to have them?

'I feel the need, the need for speed!' ;)

Ah fuckit I'll most likely still watch it, might still enoy it, beyond all the 3D slo mo testosterone flying about there might still be some humour and depth to it...
(, Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:19, Reply)
This is a normal post Like most SF
the star is the universe, not the characters. Dredd is not interesting in himself, but we got to see glimpses of the Mega-City and snippets of its history etc. That was the real hook I think.
(, Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:28, Reply)
This is a normal post Good point, in himself he really wasn't that interesting, the world he policed and all the mad shit within it was he real hook,
Seeing it that way explains why it must be fucking hard to bring it to the big screen as in the orginal strip he really isn't the main focus of most of the stories, all the robots, flying cars, belly wheels, Boing and block wars were.

He was almost a robot.
(, Fri 13 Jul 2012, 9:35, Reply)
This is a normal post Total agreement
stupid voice, stupid gurn and the ultra-explicit gore is not in the spirit.

JD was black humour almost totally lacking in gore, people fell down, that was it.
(, Fri 13 Jul 2012, 10:33, Reply)
This is a normal post Careful!
This means you're not a real man, like me, not like all the other really hard guys who read comics, play video games and own a Bat'Leth! ;)
(, Fri 13 Jul 2012, 11:09, Reply)