b3ta.com links
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 841001 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post You sound like you know what you're on about...
Do older aircraft such as this get tested regularly? (an MOT if you will...) I'm curious... If not - why not? If it's not flight-worthy surely you are endangering the lives of people on the ground too, let alone yourself/passengers.
(, Wed 8 Aug 2012, 13:34, Reply)
This is a normal post Mostly, yes they do.
Or rather should do. The CAA mandates the following check cycle for light aircraft (the FAA is probably similar but I haven't checked):

-Before the first flight of the day
-Every 50 hours
-Every 150 hours
-Annual inspection

The first in the list is a full visual inspection. Checking for panel damage, control surface operation, engine fluid levels, fuel contamination, instrument operation, lights serviceability, tyre condition etc.

The subsequent checks all go a lot deeper into things. The annual involves a full stripdown and inspection of the engine.


I don't know of any pilot who'd be comfortable getting into a plane they hadn't carefully inspected. It's a self-preservation thing...
(, Wed 8 Aug 2012, 13:52, Reply)
This is a normal post You forgot
-Kick the tires
(, Wed 8 Aug 2012, 14:35, Reply)
This is a normal post Well that eases my mind somewhat...

NTSB's preliminary report: www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=20120701X65804&key=1

Thanks for detailing that for me, I guess it's even more stringent for helicopters with all those extra moving bits. I suppose things still fail sometimes.

I've read a lot of the comments regarding the crash above and it seems that it was a combination of overloading and air density. The altimeter says 6000ft before they take off.

This was one of the comments: As soon as the a/c leaved the ground effect (~Half Span of the a/c), the engine can't provide enough power to keep the a/c flying because of (supposition) High/Hot conditions or mass overloading.

As soon as they came in backside of the Power curve, there were already doomed...

Crashing straight ahead WAS the best option...

Here a footage of a similar crash which ended deadly because they went for a turn while loosing altitude/stalling: (skip to 06:00)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_8AHC9Xus0

Guess it's easy flying from behind your keynoard AFTER the event.

Thanks again.
(, Wed 8 Aug 2012, 14:44, Reply)