that's an outrageous suggestion. that Progressive Insurance are soulless cunts.
although if Progressive Insurance weren't soulless cunts people wouldn't feel the need. the need that is to say that Progressive Insurance are soulless cunts.
(
tickle I was away, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 11:33,
Reply)
Whilst I might demur on Progressive Insurance being soulless cunts while still
respecting your rights to assert soulless cunts as a description of Progressive Insurance, it is the notion that progressive insurance being soulless cunts infers that progressive insurance are the only soulless cunts in the insurance game. I certainly can empathise with the position that "soulless cunts" and ""progressive insurance" are very much linked as mutually, but yet this does not preclude insurance services other than progressive insurance being soulless cunts. I agree that progressive are soulless cunts or progressive insurance are not the only soulless cunts ( in the first instance being a definitive statement that progressive insurance ARE soulless cunts and in the second instance that progressive insurance are definitively soulless cunts but not the only soulless cunts ) and it is fair to say that the statement "Progressive Insurance are Soulless Cunts" is a reasonable description of the soulless cunts that are progressive insurance and thus I hope to make it clear that Progressive Insurance = Soulless cunts +/- other soulless cunts that are not progressive insurance but the fixed figure of a = progressive insurance are soulless cunts and soulless cunts/progressive insurance where progressive insurance being soulless cunts is a constant
(
unclepills Sixty 25th of Decembers, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 14:46,
Reply)