Mad religious types spread that view though...
There are plenty of fairly sane religious people who don't subscribe to intervention and are much more relaxed and personable than this ranting nut. I'm not religious but neither am I an aetheist.
I am not giving these people any kind of kudos just because they tie their pants of anger to the flagpole of Religiosity.
He'd still be a nut if he was a COD fan who'd discovered a bug that deleted his save file.
(, Sat 15 Dec 2012, 11:45, Reply)
Believing in god, is logically the same
assumption as that of divine intervention.
I'm not giving them any kind of kudos just because they are more relaxed and don't subscribe to intervention.
(
omnitruncatedkraken from Empire Algol, Sat 15 Dec 2012, 12:13,
Reply)
I believe in God and I don't believe in divine intervention
Maybe I'm crazy. Actually I am crazy..... don't argue with me about this. I can make no logical defense. Sorry.
(, Sat 15 Dec 2012, 12:32, Reply)
I'm with you
personally I find the prospect of a life of cold objective reason unappealing, and usually find those to claim to have achieved such to be laughably deluded.
(, Sat 15 Dec 2012, 12:54, Reply)
My points were strictly in abstracto.
Nothing personal going here. No need for flag waiving. Cheer up.
(
omnitruncatedkraken from Empire Algol, Sat 15 Dec 2012, 13:06,
Reply)
Chilled.
But my view of human nature has not been improved by me eating all the christmas presents I bought for 'other people' over the last 72 hours, and thus being a fat bastard.
(, Sat 15 Dec 2012, 13:13, Reply)
Not believing in god doesn't necessarily mean you to live a life or are attempting to live a life of cold objective reasoning.
I think that's quite a weird assumption to make :/
EDIT
(, Sat 15 Dec 2012, 13:43, Reply)
Also, acknowledging you are not perfectly rational
does not mean that you are obliged to believe in fairies...
(
omnitruncatedkraken from Empire Algol, Sat 15 Dec 2012, 14:36,
Reply)