OK. I think I see the problem here.
You're educationally sub-normal.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 27 May 2011, 14:38, 2 replies)

Hate to correct you Mein Doktor
but I'll do it anyway.
(Che Grimsdale Best before:, Fri 27 May 2011, 15:30, closed)

Ah, clever.
Educationally sub-normal. What gives you that idea?

And what does it mean? Educated to a level below the norm? If so, then no.
(Che Grimsdale Best before:, Fri 27 May 2011, 15:54, closed)

It means you're too thick to hold up your end of this conversation.

( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 27 May 2011, 16:06, closed)

Don't be so sure
At least I don't retrospectively edit my parts of the dialogue to give an impression that my interlocutor is a spazz-brain.
(Che Grimsdale Best before:, Fri 27 May 2011, 16:21, closed)

You genuinely don't understand tautology, do you?
Bless.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 27 May 2011, 18:14, closed)

Er, yes. I do.
a. Needless repetition of the same sense in different words; redundancy.
b. An instance of such repetition.

Quote: "You didn't invent anything new." the 'new' is redundant, or you could have said: "You didn't produce anything new."

So double Bless.
(Che Grimsdale Best before:, Tue 31 May 2011, 10:46, closed)