b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » This book changed my life » Post 162046 | Search
This is a question This book changed my life

The Goat writes, "Some books have made a huge impact on my life." It's true. It wasn't until the b3ta mods read the Flashman novels that we changed from mild-mannered computer operators into heavily-whiskered copulators, poltroons and all round bastards in a well-known cavalry regiment.

What books have changed the way you think, the way you live, or just gave you a rollicking good time?

Friendly hint: A bit of background rather than just a bunch of book titles would make your stories more readable

(, Thu 15 May 2008, 15:11)
Pages: Latest, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

@Satellite
I don't know what you mean when you say that Greece and Rome "could have reached a far higher potential". For what? Civilisations come and go - there's nothing particularly interesting about that. And I sure as hell can't see what the Bible has to do with it either way. (Note, of course, that the Roman collapse was the collapse of a Christian empire.) Greece and Rome were top of the class at the time. For sure, there are things we can do now that they couldn't then... but so what?

When it comes to assessing the correctness of a belief, I have sympathy with falsificationism: the idea that you can never tell whether a claim is correct. It's always possible that you're wrong. However, some claims contradict the best avaialble evidence, or are incoherent (either in their own terms, or alongside other beliefs). It's incoherent to say that this triangle has four sides, therefore the statement must be false. Other claims are empirically bogus. Finally, there are claims that we have no need to accept as true (because there's no evidence) and that we ought to believe to be untrue (because intellectual parsimony is a virtue and it demands that we accept the simplest possible account of the world). Religious claims often fail on all three bases: they're incoherent, they're empirically falsifiable, and they're needlessly complicated (inasmuch as they introduce into the world entities that are completely unnecessary for an understanding thereof).

What the PoMo crowd has right is the idea that there are often no "external" supports for some claims. Where they go wrong is in saying that "often" implies "always" and that any claim is therefore as good as any other. That's simply not true.
I also like where you're going with the 'belief' thing - shows you're not part of the post-modern crowd. However, what helps you judge whether a certain belief is right or wrong? External sources or yourself only? Is in yourself everything you need to know about any given situation?

BTW - I really don't see where you're headed with the "hope and joy" malarkey, either...
(, Tue 20 May 2008, 9:32, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, ... 1