(coff)
Let's assume that the original poster's point was the one he was making rather than the one you're responding to.
Which is that we are currently living in a simulated reality rather than we are capable of creating one that humans would find convincing.

In which case, the reality in which we find ourselves has a higher chance of being a simulation rather than "real" reality.
There are ways to test this if the simulation is less than utterly perfect. Especially if it's buggy in one way or another.

There is some argument towards the reality as simulation theory in the granular nature of space and the way that energy cannot be exchanged in a perfectly smooth manner but must be packaged in discrete quanta.
There is also some work being done on the idea that time itself is quantised, introducing the thought that the universe itself may have some manner of frame rate.
( DukeEuphoria Comes highly reccomended, Tue 6 Dec 2011, 12:21, Reply)