I used to have a theory.
The theory was that there is no film out there that doesn't already involve a murderous cyborg coming back from the future, that couldn't be improved by the addition of a murderous cyborg coming back from the future.

Then Terminator 3 came out (which, despite the name and what the people behind it want you to think, does NOT count and is NOT part of the terminator franchise, there are only 2 terminator films), and i figured, murderous time-travelling cyborgs don't guarrantee a good film.

However, I still argue that a LOT of films could be improved this way; for example Home Alone, Pride & Prejudice, Big Mommas House, The Pacifier, When Harry Met Sally, Vice Versa, Honey I Shrunk The Kids... these are all films that would be much better with a time travelling killer cyborg.
( Lumpbucket tekcubpmuL, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 18:33, 1 reply)

I'll second that...
If a time-travelling cyborg had decapitated Macauly Culkin within the first half-hour of Home Alone, I might have had the patience to see the rest of that pathetic excuse for a film.
(LongJohnBaldry, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 19:31, closed)