b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Guilty Laughs » Post 804432 | Search
This is a question Guilty Laughs

Are you the kind of person who laughs when they see a cat getting run over? Tell us about the times your sense of humour has gone beyond taste and decency.

Suggested by SnowyTheRabbit

(, Thu 22 Jul 2010, 15:19)
Pages: Latest, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

yeah, not homophobic at all.
i mean, people ALWAYS ask straight couples about the technicalities of their sex lives, don't they?
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:05, 4 replies)

Christ no, vaguely-needling banter almost never comes up at the pub...
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:07, closed)
i seem to recall the enquiry was directed to friends of his missus, to their faces, in the privacy of someone's home.
slightly different, wouldn't you agree? oh, probably not, right? since you're all oh, it's /talk vs QOTW, and if i suggested it was night time and therefore dark outside you'd come up with some theory based on something you vaguely remember seeing on HOW! as a child that DEFINITELY PROVES OTHERWISE.

anyway. can we send you some poo?
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:11, closed)
You'll have to get down from your high horse first

(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:19, closed)

I could be remembering it incorrectly, but I thought they were family friends, drinking wine at his own house.

And no, I don't see anything as '/talk vs QOTW', on account of not being four years old. I do, however, get bored of the same few idiots forming a puerile witchunt on /talk, then coopting a generally-inoffensive thread in order to swing their dicks around.

No need to send me any poo - having read your excresence already, I'd say that's mission fucking accomplished.
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:21, closed)
DOWN WITH PEOPLE BEING IRREVERENT ON A HUMOUR BASED WEBSITE!

(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:24, closed)

'irreverence' is not generally defined as 'needlessly being a cunt'.
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:32, closed)
Neither is 'taking the piss' 'being a cunt'.
Unless 'umbrage' is your middle name, anyway.
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:38, closed)
oh, zing!

(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:36, closed)
totally burnt, there.

(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:48, closed)
Gonna need to sit a cold bath after that one.

(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:52, closed)
Or even some skin-grafts

(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 16:11, closed)
We notice shit stuff on qotw
we comment on shit stuff on qotw.
As far as generally inoffensive is concerned, that answer was fucking pathetic. At least A Vagabond has had the good grace to own up to it. As for me; this is the internet, you're not sat on the next barstool, so fuck right off you prick.
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:58, closed)

That was really very interesting.
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 16:01, closed)
In jest
i'm sure they do. I doubt Vagabond really wanted to to know, he seemed to dislike them because they left his missus in a nightclub on her own.
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:18, closed)
Yeah, but it's not like she was going to get raped in a gay club is it?

(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:23, closed)
It's OK, he had a beer, a cigarette and an ashtray when he enquired
PROPER MANLY, LIKE. YOU KNOW, LIKE WHAT PROPER MEN DO. I can't be arsed to continue the hounding, but let's face facts...the cunt's scared of queers. Unlucky.
(, Tue 27 Jul 2010, 15:55, closed)
indeed. not homophobic at all.
inquisitive? surely
In fact I have to give the AVagabond credit where it's due. I pissed myself laughing thinking of the couple's reaction.
And it is a valid question. After getting through a session with the missus I am usually not in a state/mindset that makes further shenanigans seem desirable.
Barring a preference for pitching or catching that leads to some sort of agreement among the two a cointoss with the loser making do with a reacharound seems the fair(i)est (not sorry at all, needed doing) way to go about 'business'.
So, in conclusion, AVagabonds post is far from homophobic. In fact, since it stimulates one (pun intended) to consider the mechanics of a physical relationship involving too many peckers, the exact opposite seems to be the case since I wouldn't expect a homophobe to waste any time thinking about the subject at all.
(, Wed 28 Jul 2010, 10:42, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, ... 1