As per your reply
I believe the per-son wasn't discussing the hamster, rather the shop.
Then again my reasoning may not be per-fect.

EDIT: It may not be a hamster but will this do?
(Misery McUglywife an attention seeking sociopathic fuckstain., Sun 18 Nov 2012, 22:16, 1 reply)

A perspicacious observation. Personally, I'm perplexed. Perhaps the (now) original per was actually mocking a preexisting per, now ninjad out of existence, leading to a perambulating discussion of per.

Edits should be marked. Not doing so is perfidious.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Sun 18 Nov 2012, 23:01, closed)

Pervert.

(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Sun 18 Nov 2012, 23:47, closed)

*consults google*
Perruquier.

_{Yeah, I called you a wig-maker. Wot choo gonna do?}
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Sun 18 Nov 2012, 23:53, closed)