data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
Speedevil asks: What have you killed? Accidentally, or on purpose. Concepts, species, a man in Reno, the career of a well-known entertainer, or anything else.
( , Thu 22 Dec 2011, 13:18)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
In my living memory (a long time) and training, self defence in English law has always been a defence to any assault charge, including murder, as long as the force used during the defence was reasonable and proportionate (as you state) to the attack by the deceased. But if this defence is believed, the accused will be found not guilty, and therefore cannot "do time", so I don't understand what happened in this case.
Length? Life Imprisonment for murder.
( , Fri 23 Dec 2011, 22:34, 1 reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
It would probably have been much harder to defend against a manslaughter charge on the grounds of self defence than a murder charge (on the grounds that that charge already implies lack of intent), so he would still have served time if convicted.
( , Sat 24 Dec 2011, 0:38, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread