Not sure what that's supposed to prove.
There are obviously plenty of people out there who like Pink Floyd, some of them turned up and defended them, fair enough, but then the conversation stalled immediately as the counter-argument was "popular things can't be shit" which is self-evidently bollocks.

"Obvious target is shit" "Yes, I agree" "I don't agree" "then you're a cunt" "fuck off" "lolz annoyed" - this was mildly diverting to read the first time, but the appeal has worn off. "____ is shit" is a trump card, there's no way to argue against it except "oh no it isn't" or something equally stupid, like "popular things can't be shit." So what's the point of even starting it in the first place?
( Zuowan, Sat 24 Aug 2013, 0:35, 1 reply)

In a roundabout way I was actually agreeing with you while simultaneously pointing out that I was correct elsewhere on the internet.
You're perfectly allowed to like Kunt and his Gang, but they are still, objectively, shit.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Sat 24 Aug 2013, 12:00, closed)