Neighbours
I used to live next door to a pair of elderly naturists, only finding out about their hobby when they bade me a cheerful, saggy 'Hello' while I was 25 feet up a ladder repairing the chimney. Luckily, a bush broke my fall, but the memory of a fat, naked man in an ill-fitting wig will live with me forever.
( , Thu 1 Oct 2009, 12:41)
I used to live next door to a pair of elderly naturists, only finding out about their hobby when they bade me a cheerful, saggy 'Hello' while I was 25 feet up a ladder repairing the chimney. Luckily, a bush broke my fall, but the memory of a fat, naked man in an ill-fitting wig will live with me forever.
( , Thu 1 Oct 2009, 12:41)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Not really.
I understand they'd have had to choose between the real options of "False Alarm with Good Intent" or "False Alarm with Malicious Intent" - since in both cases, there was probably* no danger to life or property. Now, while I don't know the full details; their decision would depend on the circumstances of the call. Neither existing option really fits the bill - they don't really want to encourage a pisstake caller by implying that it was sensible to call out and occupy three appliances for a joss stick, or a presumably similar turnout for a barbeque*; but they also don't want to be non-PC and imply that a clearly disturbed, self-identified minority, is a nuisance.
* I'm presuming the Joss stick wasn't sitting on a pile of combustibles, and the barbeque was attended at all time whilst lit, or else he'd have been technically correct - and that's the best kind of correct. But given the rest of his actions, I'm inclined to assume he was a bit of a petty idiot.
( , Thu 1 Oct 2009, 19:12, 1 reply)
I understand they'd have had to choose between the real options of "False Alarm with Good Intent" or "False Alarm with Malicious Intent" - since in both cases, there was probably* no danger to life or property. Now, while I don't know the full details; their decision would depend on the circumstances of the call. Neither existing option really fits the bill - they don't really want to encourage a pisstake caller by implying that it was sensible to call out and occupy three appliances for a joss stick, or a presumably similar turnout for a barbeque*; but they also don't want to be non-PC and imply that a clearly disturbed, self-identified minority, is a nuisance.
* I'm presuming the Joss stick wasn't sitting on a pile of combustibles, and the barbeque was attended at all time whilst lit, or else he'd have been technically correct - and that's the best kind of correct. But given the rest of his actions, I'm inclined to assume he was a bit of a petty idiot.
( , Thu 1 Oct 2009, 19:12, 1 reply)
The joss stick was in one of those hippy looking brass holders, on a stone floor.
The barbecue had several people there.
He's not petty, he's just a twat.
( , Thu 1 Oct 2009, 21:45, closed)
The barbecue had several people there.
He's not petty, he's just a twat.
( , Thu 1 Oct 2009, 21:45, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread