Can I suggest
you actually take on board some of these comments particularly the ones about you editing your posts without making reference to the fact. It just illustrates what a cock you are when you incapable of producing a rational argument without having to go over it three or four times after your mistakes are pointed out.
( Bazongaloid, Tue 7 Oct 2008, 16:35, 1 reply)

I edited the devil in tights reply
to include information to reply to some of the other questions - so I'm not constantly replying to individual posts

sue me
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Tue 7 Oct 2008, 16:38, closed)

Sue you?
well, that is indeed an excellent response. Well done, you may have just won the internet.

It's well known that you consistently re-edit your posts without referencing the fact, not just here, but in every stupid ill thought out meandering pile of bollocks you have ever put up on the QOTW board.

I personally have called you on it more times than I care to remember. So why don't you learn from that and stop doing it.
( Bazongaloid, Tue 7 Oct 2008, 16:41, closed)

ah yes, sorry
I forget they made you Queen of Teh Internets

;)
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Tue 7 Oct 2008, 16:55, closed)

Very amusing
you can't really try and come over all superior and like you don't care though since you're the one that started this thread about some random conspiracy theory shite in the first place.

If you genuinely believe this stuff, then one, you're a fucking moron, but two, you should at least have the balls to debate it properly with people rather than running back and changing things, it's a written forum, you have time to construct your argument properly, if you can't even do that then goodness knows why you bother even starting this sort of thing.
( Bazongaloid, Tue 7 Oct 2008, 16:58, closed)

and
if posters like apeloverage extensively edit their posts so I have to edit to keep up

which department in your palace do I lodge the complaint with?

don't make me laugh - you hypocritical puffed-up f*ckwit


;)
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Tue 7 Oct 2008, 17:09, closed)

Cunt

(GloriaHull you puerile slack-jawed drooling meatslapper, Tue 7 Oct 2008, 17:20, closed)

blimey
still looking for that ignore button then?
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Tue 7 Oct 2008, 17:21, closed)

hypocritical?
and you are allowed to swear on this board you weak minded twat.

Can you point out where in my post I was hypocritical? Where have I edited my responses to suit the replies?

apeloverage did indeed add something to one of his posts, but, and here's the killer, he is not the one spouting this bollocks in the first place.

As I quite clearly said earlier, this is NOT the first time you have been told about retrospectively editing your posts and how it makes you come across as even more of a deluded freak than you actually are.

So by pointing out one example where you had a legitimate reason to edit your post, and yet I should add that you didn't put in the word "edit" to make this clear as is the custom here, you in fact show yourself to be even more stupid that your initial post.
( Bazongaloid, Tue 7 Oct 2008, 17:57, closed)

I am guilty of adding extra info to a point if I feel I haven't answered it well enough or I've thought of some extra detail to flesh it out

but radically re editing? - I don't think so

seriously, get over yourself, you puffed up little pr*ck
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 10:56, closed)

But you are
in our first encounter you constantly removed things from your replies that Enzyme showed to be crap.

And what's with "seriously, get over yourself, you puffed up little pr*ck".

I will print this large so you can get it.

I. AM. NOT. THE. ONE. WHO. STARTED. THIS. THREAD.

You are the one who needs to firstly, learn to type a well constructed argument, your random bollocks do not an easy read make, and secondly, fuck off back to your conspiracy website where, presumably, not everyone thinks you are a total cunt.
( Bazongaloid, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 11:24, closed)

"in our first encounter you constantly removed things from your replies that Enzyme showed to be crap."

that's absolute bollocks and you know it

do tell - where? what points? - i'll debate everything I've said right now - or have they slipped your memory?

it takes the biscuit when you have to invent things to put across a point, but what can we expect?
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 12:11, closed)

"that's absolute bollocks and you know it "
And i'm going to cry to mummy if you don't play nice!

Are you monumentally stupid? YOU REMOVED THE POINTS HE SHOWED TO BE WRONG. so how can I show them to you?

And funnily enough, yes the finer details of a conversation I had on the internet with a conspiracy nut have not stuck in my brain for all this time.

"when you have to invent things to put across a point"

You absolutely define irony.
( Bazongaloid, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 12:18, closed)

when did I remove these posts
do tell

and what was it about?

come on - you claim to have read the original post, after all?

if as you claim, you know that I removed something you must have known what it was to notice it missing

and the proof would exist within Enzymes posts - replying to points absent in my original!

you must have some inkling in that puffed up little head of yours?
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 12:19, closed)

As stated before
(you really don't read these replies do you) It was some time ago, you mean nothing to me therefore I don't memorise the content of the drivel you put on the internet. Enzyme and me were debating whatever it was and you kept changing your posts. I called you on it several times but you ignored me. If you are that worried about it, you can probably find it by looking back through your posting history. But I can't be bothered.
( Bazongaloid, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 12:30, closed)

ah how convenient
if you're making a claim like this you best be damn sure you have the facts to hand before making it, at the very least a link to the post - it would show Enzyme's replies and the proof would be there

you understand now, einstein?

and like I said, if as you claim, you know that I removed something you must have known what it was to notice it missing - even a general idea

it's not rocket science

you must know unless you're either lying or a retard

take your pick
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 12:35, closed)

The general thread
regarded the ability to remove yourself from having to pay taxes based on some spurious claims by another bloke who you have read about.

The page contained over 100 replies so I no longer have any idea what it was you were taking out. BECAUSE YOU DELETED IT YOU DOSY CUNT.

Now, to get back to the whole point of this thread, editing replies is fine, but you should reference the fact that you have done this. You don't do this. Which makes your posts irritating to read, and makes you come across as a twat.
( Bazongaloid, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 12:52, closed)

pfffft
I haven't deleted the post - post is all there

www.b3ta.com/questions/getrichquick/post215221

now, were are Enzyme's posts that show him replying to me about points which are missing which prove, as you claim, I've deleted sections?

I'm still waiting mouse fart

here's the bit where you back tread some more with another excuse

put up or shut up, simple enough for you?
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 12:56, closed)

I never claimed you
deleted the post nob cheese breath.

I was calling you out for retrospectively editing your posts without reference. Something you did in that thread and have repeated in this thread. I can't make it any clearer. You shouldn't edit your posts without referencing the fact.

That's all there is to it.

edit - you also have failed to point out where I have been a hypocrite
( Bazongaloid, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 13:06, closed)

nope
sorry fela, you dug this hole for yourself ,
you need to get out of it

you made a claim which I know you made up and now I'm calling you on it

you really should have thought this one through

here's the post you're claiming I deleted info from after Enzyme replied

www.b3ta.com/questions/getrichquick/post215221


show me Enyme's post which shows him replying to deleted information as you're claiming

I have been accused of adding and elaborating information by Enzyme but never deleting

remember what you said further up?

YOUR QUOTE
"in our first encounter you constantly removed things from your replies that Enzyme showed to be crap."

you said this, now I'm calling you on it

put up or shut up

go to the posts in the links provided and show me, you lying toerag

remember these are closed QOTW posts so they can't be edited

and like I said I admit to adding infomation in but I have never deleted information i've put in , and certainly not if someone challenges it -

the proof would be in their post, as it would contain a reply over an issue that isn't cointained in the original post they're replying to


it's not rocket science you dim witted mouse fart


.
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Wed 8 Oct 2008, 13:08, closed)

No
that wasn't the post I was actually talking about, but if you scroll down thorough that one, you can see me pointing out where you edited a post without referencing it.

Like I said, I don't know, or care enough to find out, which particular post of yours it was when I first pointed this out to you.

And once again, you still haven't pointed out where i'm a hypocrite.

I do like however, that your response sounds so enthusiastic, I can practically feel your erection as you gleefully think that you might have "scored a point" on the internet.
( Bazongaloid, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 10:43, closed)

pffft
you only took 24 hours to think up that reply, well done

you must mean this post;

www.b3ta.com/questions/quitters/post165091

notice the word EDIT in the original post midway down (remember old QOTW posts cannot be edited when they're closed so I couldn't habve just put this in)

then go to Enzymes post (reply 67)

he mentions I changed original post by adding in information about US being socialist because of the CAFRs point I edited in

you said I removed stuff when Enzyme pointed it out to be bollocks - this is obviously the post your referring to

and it's bollocks because he's referring to info I've added in - I even added the EDIT note

no where in that thread did Enzyme point out anything I posted was bollocks which I edited out after he said it - he said what I edited in extra was bollocks - big f*cking difference, einstein

you're a hypocrite because you turn a blind eye to posters radically editing
posts in this very thread because they are on your side of the argument while taking a hissy fit over some extra info I put in

and you're a moronic little lying twat because you invent and bandy lies around which you know to be false or are too f*cking moronic to even bother checking your serious accusations

I won't hold my breath for an apology
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 11:53, closed)

Funnily enough
I don't spend 24 hours a day on the internet looking at your posts.

Now, your most recent link is still not the right post because as you may have noticed, I never posted a reply to that question.

So what apeloverage did is a radical re-editting and what you did is adding some extra info. Hmmmmm. I did actually recognise that apeloverage added stuff to his post, and he should have noted that, but it's the first time I've ever seen him do that, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

I invent and bandy about lies which I know to be false? Well, yes, it's true, I didn't kidnap and murder Madeline Mcann and I never had a wank on m radiator. I did however eat beans flavoured with apple juice and they were very unpleasant.
( Bazongaloid, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 12:07, closed)

yep its the post
you referred to

it's the post with over 100 replies you mention above

the only post of mine to have that many

there's a big difference between a serious discussion and personal accusations in the context of them and the other malarky we get up to on this site, and you well know it

don't worry, I don't expect anything else - keep with the wise cracks to try to save face
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 12:14, closed)

Can I make this clearer?
It isn't the post I'm talking about, the post I'm talking about had replies from me. I didn't reply to that post ergo, it cannot be that post.
( Bazongaloid, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 12:18, closed)

you're a joke

(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 12:24, closed)

And once again
you define irony.
( Bazongaloid, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 12:28, closed)

from a guy
without balls enough or self respect enough to admit he's wrong when hes found out

here's a tip; next time you bandy accustaions around - have a f*cking idea what you're referring to in the future without wasting my f*cking time finding the posts for you

otherwise you just come across as a little moronic tit

YES, IT'S THAT POST
reread your own f*cking posts to see how you described it - you even told me the amount of replies it had
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 12:30, closed)

Actually
you'll find that by wasting your time searching endlessly for a post in order to try and prove a point not just on the internet, but on a site like B3ta, you look far more like a moron.

You've been shown to have edited posts again and again without reference and yet you continue in your little deluded world where everyone is out to get you.

They aren't. Nobody actually cares about you at all.

edit - you've just done it again! You just added two paragraphs to the end of your previous reply. And I'll say it one more time. It isn't that post.
( Bazongaloid, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 13:01, closed)

like I said
still a stubborn tit to the very end

and here's the point again as you seem to keep missing it,:

next time you bandy accusations around - have a f*cking idea what you're referring to in the future without wasting my f*cking time finding the posts for you

otherwise you just come across as a little moronic tit

I can't say it any clearer for you

it's the ONLY post of mine with more than 100 replies on the subject you mentioned

reread you own f*cking posts shit-for-brains
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 13:41, closed)

Has the thought crossed your mind
that my original throwaway comment regarding the number of replies could have been incorrect?

I did try and make it clear that I don't know when you posted it and what it was about, since I never bother reading your garbage properly.

You wasted your own time searching and getting your little knickers all sweaty and twisted.

As it happens, it's irrelevant as you have done all the re-editing I talked about on this very thread. So, you know, nerrr nerrr ne nerr nerrrrrr!

You should probably have a lie down and take some deep breaths and maybe even go outside, look at the sun and talk to some real people.
( Bazongaloid, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 13:50, closed)

let me remin d you
of what you said eh?

YOUR QUOTE:"in our first encounter you constantly removed things from your replies that Enzyme showed to be crap."

I HAVE NEVER DONE THIS , yes, I've added stuff in to expand a point - but never delete when someone is debating it

I asked you to prove it by showing me Enzymes post

you said you didn't know but it was 'about tax' with well over '100 replies'

i provided you the post you described , over 100 replies, tax, Enzyme reply e etc

and even though this is the ONLY post of mine fitting that description

you say it's not that yet are unable to even provide a general clue of where it is any more

don't make me f*cking laugh you little prick
(The Goat www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 13:57, closed)

Well
if you're going to be like that. I'm taking my ball home and we're not going to play any more.
( Bazongaloid, Thu 9 Oct 2008, 14:02, closed)