I'd have the same issue with you if you'd commented on someone who never posts on /talk - which parts of the site someone uses is immaterial.

( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Fri 28 Oct 2011, 13:27, 1 reply)

Actually - You're Wrong

There's a massive correlation between QOTW comments and if they're mean, spiteful, derogatory or just plain rude and /talk. It's easy to prove. Look at any past question and the comments. 80%+ of nasty comments will be for someone who has more than 2000 posts on /talk.

If I can be arsed - I might even write a script that will show this.

Cheers
( Legless Mister Stabby - shanks for the memory, Fri 28 Oct 2011, 13:40, closed)

oh god what's happening

(arseboon dilbaro arseboon dilbaro, Fri 28 Oct 2011, 13:43, closed)

or you could stop worrying about it altogether and try another website.
they'd LOVE you over at the daily mail, with your incisive telling-it-like-it-is style.
( janet aylia y'all motherfuckers need jesus, Fri 28 Oct 2011, 13:47, closed)

You misunderstood what I wrote.
My problem with your post is that you posted a rant about an individual.

If you don't like what some people have to say use the ignore button. If you don't like a qotw subject don't read it.

You don't have to write a post slagging somebody off. The fact that you have chosen to post about someone on /talk rather than someone on /links or /board is immaterial to my disagreement with your actions.
( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Fri 28 Oct 2011, 13:49, closed)

There's also quite a high correlation between people posting on /talk and them winning QotW

( WormuIus, Fri 28 Oct 2011, 14:18, closed)

www.pown.it/3209
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Fri 28 Oct 2011, 15:00, closed)

Hahahahahahahaha.
You clueless and joyless twat.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 28 Oct 2011, 17:40, closed)