no the problem was that the cyclist was in the middle of the road
causing the truck to have to swing out as it wouldn't have been able to stop in time

you stupid lycra wearing shitcunt
(Quintno EXPERIMENT RUINED CANCELLED, LEFT 4EVER, Fri 17 Feb 2012, 15:04, 2 replies)

^What fat boy said^
If you're going to cycle on the dual carriageway, you'd better be on the left hand side, and prepared to resemble mince at some point, if you're not going to use the cycle lane.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Fri 17 Feb 2012, 15:11, closed)

All cyclist mince.
Because cycling makes you gay.

And, if anyone doubts this, I've carried out extensive research based on my own prejudices and also that of others who think men in coloured lycra are a bit suspect.

Science.
( Infidel , shit and wrong, Fri 17 Feb 2012, 16:13, closed)

Because cycle lanes are compulsory? Try reading the Highway Code.
(chilling, Fri 17 Feb 2012, 16:36, closed)

You aren't being very clear here. If you were on a dual carriage way and the danger was a head on collision one or other of you must have broken the law by crossing the central reservation so it would be the fault of whoever did that.

If it was the truck moving from the nearside lane to the outside lane to pass the cyclist putting you in danger then it's the truck drivers fault for not leaving sufficient room to brake safely / not checking his mirrors before manoeuvring.
(chilling, Fri 17 Feb 2012, 16:33, closed)

you're thick i'm not responding to you anymore
i hope you fall under a truck and get hit by a bus
(Quintno EXPERIMENT RUINED CANCELLED, LEFT 4EVER, Fri 17 Feb 2012, 17:24, closed)

lol, internet

( sanityclause is waiting until, Fri 17 Feb 2012, 17:54, closed)

Winner
(chilling, Fri 17 Feb 2012, 18:37, closed)