Neither is right
My point is that they just have absolutely piss all to do with each other, its like saying chicken is better than cement. I am against circumcision (mostly because it looks funny, its not fair to the baby and guys have said it must be so painful it being constantly exposed like that) but that is completely incomparable to female genital mutilation.
Also if you want to find horror stories, David Reimer might be a better bet than some mad rabbi.
(Popiella Jones, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 18:46, 2 replies)

Oh, come on, you don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about, do you? You're even loading your opinion into the choice of words. Circumcision is male genital mutilation, female genital mutilation is female circumcision. Using the nastier sounding term just for the female one does not help you.

They are both an assault on a child that causes permanent damage, it's just one is acceptable in our society and one is not. They are very much the same thing. Saying that you're against lopping off part of a child's body for no reason because it wouldn't look as nice is, frankly, disgusting.

And chicken is better than cement, you dumb bint.
( Ungersven would support SpankyHanky's patreon, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 21:24, closed)

I don't like to rollerskate on chicken =(
(St Sepulchre's Belle tolled for thee on, Mon 4 Jan 2010, 8:20, closed)

bollocks they are incomparable, they are both outdated pieces of religiously inspired genital barbarity aimed at making sex or masturbation too painful to be done for fun.

IS FGM more invasive than MGM? yes, i never said any different, now did i?

Other than that you have totally proven my point that some women make light of mutilating little boys cocks whilst getting a case of the vapours at even the mention of FGM. Thanks for that.
(Matty73, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 21:44, closed)