^^
"Eventually I threw my drink over her and walked out, taking both my money and hers...er whoops, guess that gave away the answer."

So whilst you were out you got into an argument about the handbrake, something which could have easily been demonstrated after when you returned to her car. She drove to yours and took you out. Though you had £10 you insisted you split the bill (or at least she gave you change) having already berating her for not knowing about her car. After you exhausted yourself on these points you brought up the subject of her talking about sex(!) - firmly missing the point that as you were both over the age of consent perhaps she just wanted some. So you threw a drink over her stole her money and left her to pick up the bill... congrats.
( @><|= w0nu!) or cunt to my friends, Sat 20 Mar 2010, 8:23, 1 reply)

No
It was only one of them. The second one. About money. I got so frustrated trying to persuade her how the exchange worked I lost my temper. The other two options are true, but they're not this story. Anyway I still win the question, because she was the ignorant one. I was just the one with anger management issues.

And for the record, I am indeed a captain of logic. I'm also a student of human nature, and as such know fine well that 'logic' doesn't often get a say.
(Falstaff's Spiritual Successor, Sun 21 Mar 2010, 11:11, closed)

Perhaps my logic is flawed...
... but I don't see how your reply relates to what I wrote at all, other than your admission of anger management issues.

As for winning "the question", I suppose you are continuing to display amazing ignorance irregardless of your human nature studies - must try harder.
( @><|= w0nu!) or cunt to my friends, Sun 21 Mar 2010, 23:13, closed)