not angry at all
i edited my post, probably when you were still replying, as i felt that calling you a snivelling bully was unnecessary.
pointing out that you are a twat based on your behaviour is entirely reasonable though.

you're one of those b3ta fatties aren't you?
( real i'm not happy 'til you're not happy, Thu 19 Apr 2012, 1:45, 1 reply)

So you're a chubby chaser and this is grooming?
Sorry, no I'm not a b3ta fattie.

Pointing out that you didn't know and then completely ignored the facts when presented, but still persist judging my behaviour is not quite reasonable. Just twattish.

Admitting you were wrong would mean you'd have to 'man up' though, so I suppose that's never going to happen.

Every other poster on this thread has at least conceded a point here and there and shown they are open to an honest debate. This however seems beyond you, so we'd better just let you calm down and go back to your own little world.

Any final insults to throw?
(Kliper Filllets Getting noticed by twats on the internet since, Thu 19 Apr 2012, 7:39, closed)

i'm not wrong and if i were, i'd happily accept it
the reason i asked if you were a fatty was because 6 foot is easily wide enough for a cyclist and a pedestrian to pass without incident. unless of course, you're just really, really, fat.

for you to have enough room to side step and then shove him (as you described elsewhere), it seems you had more room than you've been alluding to as well.

but then you maintain the cyclist was cycling right at you, intent on crashing, which is why you shoved him.
i don't understand how you fail to comprehend how illogical and unlikey it would be for a cyclist to purposely crash into a pedestrian.

furthermore, i can't ignore the your earlier post either, where you stated having numerous encounters with cyclists and you've punched them before, only after allowing them to throw punches first (yeah, right!)

also, the point where you said you saw him crash, but in another post you didn't see him. this suggests to me that you're making up details

more likely, you shouted at the cyclist, he ignored you and then you shoved him off his bike because your ego was deflated
( real i'm not happy 'til you're not happy, Thu 19 Apr 2012, 10:24, closed)

Oh dear lord.
Please, just once, try reading what I've written.

Cyclist DO ride staight at pedestrians. Fact. Only this morning once jumped the lights and nearly ran over a woman in front of me. He hit her shoulderbag and carried on, but it was a close call. There are dicks out there - you possibly one of them.

As for not seeing the crash, again I actually wrote that I didn't watch him crash, I heard it and turned round just in time to see him landing and then get up. I was more concerned about nearly being run over to actually watch him, and as it was only a gentle push to ensure he didn't go into me, I wasn't really expecting him to come off anyway.

The gap, as I said WOULD have been big enough if only he'd kept to one side, not come straight at me when I was already walking close to the building. Can you comprehend this?

Obviously you're unable to read facts as they are presented, but instead choose to pick and choose points, make up your own, etc., just to try to win an argument.

Sad doesn't even begin to describe how you're coming across.
(Kliper Filllets Getting noticed by twats on the internet since, Thu 19 Apr 2012, 10:35, closed)

as sad as the karate expert that frequently assaults cyclists?
just wondering, was the guy shouting kamikaze as he was attempting to take you both out?
( real i'm not happy 'til you're not happy, Thu 19 Apr 2012, 13:08, closed)