
If a few people think dodging officials and living on benefits is a good way to live, let 'em. If you want the self-satisfaction of seeing them (and, at the risk of appealing to emotion, their kids) on the streets or in a shitty hostel at the risk of terrorising legitimate, unfortunate people, fuck off.
( , Tue 5 Feb 2008, 14:27, archived)

as you'll always have a minor percentage pushing the boundaries. The start of this story, however, was due to the increasing number of people in this category, and how to tackle that increase.
Or do you think we should give anyone who asks for it state accomodation, whatever the cost?
( , Tue 5 Feb 2008, 14:35, archived)

I don't mind paying tax so people have a roof over their heads if they need it.
( , Tue 5 Feb 2008, 14:39, archived)

the ultimate cost was a level of taxation akin to 76% of your income, the complete collapse of privatised industry due to the lack of money flow, massive crime from lack of domestic goods and a crippled ineffective bureaucratic state trying to manage it.
It's nice in theory, but it just doesn't work.
( , Tue 5 Feb 2008, 14:45, archived)

"eviction is wrong." However, it still happens every single day right now in councils up and down the country, and will continue for as long as people abuse the system.
Looking after the needy is necessary, but it doesn't take too long before every single person is classified as "in need." You therefore have to prioritise, and that's all this minister has suggested; a new method to make the housing situation more fluid, to get the more needy people in as quick as possible and the less needy out.
( , Tue 5 Feb 2008, 14:56, archived)