No probably not
I just find the hypocrisy of this moral crusade startling. You will allow the afformentioned things to go by without a fuss, and from many a snigger, yet you'd rather attack this person, who you all KNOW isn't actually a racist, just because she said the word 'paki'.
( shitshitshitshit x_x, Thu 26 Jun 2008, 19:16, archived)

You can't win,

( well, Thu 26 Jun 2008, 19:17, archived)

I know
But what the hell.
( shitshitshitshit x_x, Thu 26 Jun 2008, 19:19, archived)

We're mainly replying to her bizarre justifications,
and moronic statements.

As I said above, I don't think she's racist, but if she tries to justify her actions the way she has here in the real world she'll be crucified.

Who knows, maybe she'll learn something.
( chenobble rocking his explorer beard on, Thu 26 Jun 2008, 19:20, archived)

Go back and read the original thread
It may put the discussion in context.
( chenobble rocking his explorer beard on, Thu 26 Jun 2008, 19:22, archived)

It was a really shit joke
That's all she's guilty of. That and digging herself into a whole when trying to explain it away.
( shitshitshitshit x_x, Thu 26 Jun 2008, 19:25, archived)

exactly.
If she'd responded originally "Well it was a poor taste joke that fell flat, meh." then no-one would have cared.

Instead she kept trying to say it wasn't racist, or that the word 'paki' wasn't racist. Most /talkers are fine with tongue in cheek racism but if you try to justify it beyond that you'll rightly get ripped apart.

It's what keeps this place a funny, irreverent website rather than a BNP sounding board.
( chenobble rocking his explorer beard on, Thu 26 Jun 2008, 19:32, archived)