Depends what you're doing.

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:52, archived)

Also, you say £2, but then you have to have them developed.

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:52, archived)

Would it be more cost effective to get a cheapy digicam from Argos?
I don't give a toss about the amount of megapixels, but I'd like a proper camera for my birthday celebrations.
( Bats, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:55, archived)

I did exactly this and it worked brilliantly.

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:57, archived)

why you ask that? why
:(
( mongychops, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:53, archived)

Well, if she's going to be doing something where she'll just be wandering around, able to stop and photograph things properly,
a digital camera would be more appropriate.
If she's off doing something all fast paced and that, she'd be better with a quick point and click disposable.
Or not, no offence, forum banter, great.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:56, archived)

Out drinking with friends and doing a bit of touristy stuff in London.
Argos have a digicam for £15, I might get that.
( Bats, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:57, archived)

Do this.

( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:58, archived)

If you get a disposable you might run out of film before you know it,
whereas you can clear space/add more memory to a digital.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:58, archived)

but you fell into the trap man, it's how this blogger operates, and i don't mean that in a nasty way, i'm nice, honest, no offence

( mongychops, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:59, archived)