that don't cause material harm to or restrict the liberty of others.
It's complicated because you can of course argue for a change in the laws themselves to alter the definitions used above - you can argue for a change in the law to enforce mandatory deportation, but not tell your supporters to kidnap and deport people, for example.
You can't walk into a police station and confess to a murder and then claim at the trial you were just expressing free speech. You can't shout "fire" and cause a stampede in which people get injured and die.
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 12:34, archived)