That's what I'm saying.
But doesn't that seem weird and wrong?
(
Comma, Tue 23 Jun 2009, 22:04,
archived)
No. Why?
Only because you choose something you know and then give it a "weird and wrong" definition.
If all blee consists of crawt and fleem, then blee without fleem is just crawt. Or fleemless blee.
(
Flapjack I spay a little mare for you, Tue 23 Jun 2009, 22:07,
archived)