The primary function of mammary glands is
indeed maternal, but their presentation as large globes is a sexual display, according to Desmond Morris. And I agree with your second point entirely, but would like to add that it seems to me that television or film counts as a pretty safe context, as characters can not yet leap out of the screen and grab infants from their seats. However, I'm interested in your use of the word "natural" - would you intentionally "protect" your children from the sight of someone with piercings, for example?]#

And also, 'ning to you too.
(Withiel assumes the position!, Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:24, archived)

by natural
I mean "naked in a non-sexual sense" - I don't think it's appropriate to expose my kids to sexual nudity at their ages, nor for another ten years at least. I don't have a problem with piercings and the like
( Jadeviper was still alive on, Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:26, archived)

Ah
That makes a lot more sense.
(Withiel assumes the position!, Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:28, archived)

for example
we walk around the house naked, the kids often share baths/showers with us. the exception is Mr V covers up first thing in the morning.
( Jadeviper was still alive on, Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:30, archived)

arf!
morning glory?
( asparagus time Is in Brazil., Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:31, archived)

indeed
and not appropriate for inquisitive soon-to-be-three year olds
( Jadeviper was still alive on, Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:34, archived)

I feel
that a saner society is perhaps on its way.
/is gratified in a non-pervert way.
(Withiel assumes the position!, Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:32, archived)