To subtle? Or just too silly?
Click for bigger (160 kb)
Edit: On reflection this is waaay too silly and subtle (try the filename)
From the Make Art More Awesome challenge. See all 735 entries (closed)
( , Tue 23 Mar 2010, 12:55, archived)
Click for bigger (160 kb)
Edit: On reflection this is waaay too silly and subtle (try the filename)
From the Make Art More Awesome challenge. See all 735 entries (closed)
( , Tue 23 Mar 2010, 12:55, archived)
this compo
has shown me that I am quite ignorant of many works of art
( ,
Tue 23 Mar 2010, 12:57,
archived)
me too
if they were any good though the museums would make you pay to look at them
( ,
Tue 23 Mar 2010, 13:00,
archived)
interesting
perhaps they should pay us to look at the really really crap ones
( ,
Tue 23 Mar 2010, 13:05,
archived)
And then you could look at some great ones and some crap ones to even out the score
( ,
Tue 23 Mar 2010, 13:07,
archived)
It is possible to make Lichtenstein more awesome
Just view the original comics that he copied, enlarged and fobbed off as his own work. What you have done to his painting is about as artistically valuable as his ye old cut and paste efforts. well done have a cigarette and a New York studio flat.
( ,
Wed 24 Mar 2010, 18:58,
archived)
What's 'bukkake'?
No idea.
To me, it looks like she's being blasted with teh jizz...
( ,
Thu 25 Mar 2010, 5:36,
archived)
To me, it looks like she's being blasted with teh jizz...
If it's close encounters don't you need to lop the top off that mountain?
EDIT: Ahh, I gottit.
( ,
Tue 23 Mar 2010, 13:02,
archived)
Nice one.... and nom nom nom...
If I may - whores out a pearoast.
( ,
Tue 23 Mar 2010, 13:05,
archived)