b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10062450 (Thread)

# But that's just the point
I don't believe that god doesn't exist. I think that there's no evidence for his existence, and I don't think that there could be; but I have no positive claim on the matter either way.

I'm sympathetic to Jonathan Miller here: he refuses to call himself an atheist for the same reason that he refuses to call himself an a-unicornist - for him, there's just nothing worth saying in the label, because the god-hypothesis is so obviously without foundation that there's no real point wasting energy fighting it.

There seems to be a lot of wisdom in that attitude.
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 13:27, archived)
# But ... but ... but in your profile musings on the subject of god, you claim that the atheists are right, and that agnostics need to grow up and are intellectually barren!
Now I don't know where you stand on the matter!
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 13:31, archived)
# Ha!
Well, you might have me on that...

Hmmmm...

I think that the atheists are right to the extent that they don't invoke - and are resistant to invoking - the supernatural. That seems like obviously the correct strategy.

And - oh, all right then: whether or not I would class myself as an atheist or reject even that label is something about which I'm not wholly decided. In most situations, the two descriptions amount to the same, though...
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 13:43, archived)
# Goedel's Theorem:
nature can't be a complete and consistent system.
(, Mon 24 May 2010, 14:27, archived)