b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10099955 (Thread)

# Oh, there are some tests which are valid.
The results may be short term and one can never prove a negative, but there are valid experiments.
(, Wed 23 Jun 2010, 11:01, archived)
# Please give an example of a valid experiment.
I really can't imagine one.
(, Wed 23 Jun 2010, 14:28, archived)
# Okay, really basic stuff and not real example, but:
I want to know if a Search Engine follows plain text links, so I write www.somesite.co.uk/manleys-new-test/ and then I link to that page once with a plain text link from an unused but indexed page.

After that I know if it does.

Of course I can never know if it doesn't.
(, Fri 25 Jun 2010, 10:44, archived)
# I'm sure you're going to say "bad seo"
but so many companies claim to test all of the small theories as part of their skill base.

eg testing for keyword density

There are so many variables to keep constant that I think it would be impossible to prove anything about this from any test.

Your test makes sense for the job, but when I worked for a company whose SEO team who passed all their work onto the developers, we were never once asked to build any sort of testing sites or tools. I'm sure the root of my cynicism comes down to that!

Ultimately, I'd have thought that an expert would know the limits of what is testable, though I suspect many SEOs get work by saying "we know this through testing...", rather than "no one can know this but it makes logical sense in theory because..."

(, Fri 25 Jun 2010, 17:32, archived)