hehe
believe it or not, I actually ran it through colour match and this is the best I could do ;)
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2010, 15:38,
archived)
I have found that increasing or decreasing the amount of blue -- not changing hue, gives the best chance for accuracy
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2010, 15:44,
archived)
Also:
confined color-balance adjustment layers are the most flexible way I've found to colourmatch.
Throw a levels layer and a hue/sat layer in there and you can match most things passably well, assuming they're not stupidly mismatched to begin with.
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2010, 15:59,
archived)
Throw a levels layer and a hue/sat layer in there and you can match most things passably well, assuming they're not stupidly mismatched to begin with.
Haha sorry that sounds dickishly technical
all I meant was this:
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2010, 16:05,
archived)
Cheers matey
I have never seen those symbols before so I must have a lot to learn ;)
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2010, 16:17,
archived)
If you're interested try looking up Adjustment Layers.
I reckon it's worth getting comfortable with them. It looks like an unecessarily complex way of working at first but it's very easy to get used to and it's very flexible and powerful.
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2010, 16:42,
archived)
Admittedly.
But I do manually assemble the pixel order using binary.
( ,
Sat 26 Jun 2010, 16:31,
archived)