
We got to the top and there was a video loop of a naked young lady covering herself in paint, and then rolling around in feathers. There were several goaty beards in front of this video, hmming and observing the wit of the irony, and I strode up in front of it into the middle of them, put my hands on my hips and declared 'Excellent!'
When it looped back 'round I announced 'Right! I'm off to the toilet!' and my mate dragged me away as he didn't think my comments were being appreciated.
( ,
Thu 14 Oct 2010, 16:43,
archived)
When it looped back 'round I announced 'Right! I'm off to the toilet!' and my mate dragged me away as he didn't think my comments were being appreciated.

"hey, I fucked her. That's what she was into as I recall. It was dreadful cleaning the sheets afterwards"
( ,
Thu 14 Oct 2010, 16:46,
archived)

but I am serious.
I am going to do more of these.
( ,
Thu 14 Oct 2010, 16:46,
archived)
I am going to do more of these.


I am already working on tomorrows, which is to be titled
[Engineering](158)101015
( ,
Thu 14 Oct 2010, 16:49,
archived)
[Engineering](158)101015

OK - how is it a drawing of a duck? I assume the numerals are just your internal audit trail/filing.
( ,
Thu 14 Oct 2010, 16:56,
archived)

it's an line drawing in ink of [A drawing of a duck](38)101015
I could explain, but I don't want to yet.
( ,
Thu 14 Oct 2010, 16:59,
archived)
I could explain, but I don't want to yet.

I don't see any other connection between the title and the drawing other than that you deem it so. It doesn't adhere to, stretch or challenge conventional understanding so much as completely ignores it.
Things that do this (of which, I grant, there are many - the Brit art Brat pack - Hirst, Emin et al) cannot be deemed art, and generally is not worthy of interest.
/opinionslol
( ,
Thu 14 Oct 2010, 17:05,
archived)
Things that do this (of which, I grant, there are many - the Brit art Brat pack - Hirst, Emin et al) cannot be deemed art, and generally is not worthy of interest.
/opinionslol