The part that I don't getis that the vikings had access to fresh fish, at worst they might have to deal with frozen seas for 3 or 4 months at a time.
What posessed them to do this?
WHAT
(What posessed them to do this?
WHAT
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Fri 5 Nov 2010, 13:17,
archived)
Ancestors eh?Anglo-saxon peasants used to enjoy rancid bacon for lunch when they were toiling in the fields. The key word there is enjoy.
(
Smallbrainfield,
Fri 5 Nov 2010, 13:25,
archived)
well it is certainly worth stating that hunger is the best saucealso that salty fatty food was a rarity for all of human development except for the last 60 years. Maybe salt was a novelty.
NOT FOR THOSE SEAFARING VIKINGS
(NOT FOR THOSE SEAFARING VIKINGS
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Fri 5 Nov 2010, 13:35,
archived)
Faaahking Nordic pikeys!
Colonel Boris "...a desperate Buzzfeed imitation...",
Fri 5 Nov 2010, 13:40,
archived)
Salt was an expensive commodity if I remembermy junior school history lessons properly.
( Smallbrainfield,
Fri 5 Nov 2010, 13:44,
archived)
NOT FOR THOSE SEAFARING VIKINGS
(
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Fri 5 Nov 2010, 13:45,
archived)
Perhaps they had enough of salt at sea.'NOT SALT AGAIN WOMAN! STAND AGAINST THAT SHIELD WHILE I THROW MINE AXE AT THINE PIG-TAILS! WHERE IS MINE LUTEFISK?'
( Smallbrainfield,
Fri 5 Nov 2010, 13:49,
archived)