I got asked - I gave an opinion
not to promote B3ta but I dunno - because I was asked. And being someone who has lived and worked on the internet since about 1992, I do have opinions.
I completely support Wikileaks. But yeah, Anon is (in my opinion) going about it in the wrong way.
Wikileaks has leaked some fantastic and alarming material, and going all cyberwarrior is giving the establishment a great excuse not to concentrate on the content of the leaks - but the hoohah around them.
I believe Anon are playing into the hands of the people who wish Wikileaks and free speech dead.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:31,
archived)
I completely support Wikileaks. But yeah, Anon is (in my opinion) going about it in the wrong way.
Wikileaks has leaked some fantastic and alarming material, and going all cyberwarrior is giving the establishment a great excuse not to concentrate on the content of the leaks - but the hoohah around them.
I believe Anon are playing into the hands of the people who wish Wikileaks and free speech dead.
it's the spelling my name wrong that hurts more
I know I'm a cunt, but get my name right please.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:40,
archived)
Manual, right?
Easy to read, light instructions on dealing with opinions on and of the internet.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:41,
archived)
Manuell Cunt?
isn't he that philosopher geezer?
www.rep.routledge.com/article/DB047
( ,
Sun 12 Dec 2010, 18:21,
archived)
www.rep.routledge.com/article/DB047
Somehow
I think this reply is going to be lost to the people who at first scroll down and then see the Queen with the enormous udders.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:35,
archived)
Surely not.
As the chap pointed out, this is "srs biznz". Who could trivialize that?
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:40,
archived)
He gets the entertainment wedge.
For this was a trivial pursuit. Ho ho!
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:46,
archived)
I agree with you, but being mean to people more important than myself makes my pants wet, you big smelly cunt.
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:38,
archived)
eeenteresting...
I find it interesting that when a person expresses their own personal opinions/views about someone/something it's considered an "attack." Someone then gets on the defense and tears down the author of those opinions and views. Forgive me but I just find it quite interesting that free speech cannot be a one sided deal where only one side spouts their opinions and ideas and the rest of us cannot say a thing. Might I just say that free speech is not dead, no matter how one might try to suppress it. So, yes why not focus on the actual content rather than make a mole hill appear larger than life? And this is my personal view - Rob, thou art cool :)
( ,
Sat 11 Dec 2010, 22:53,
archived)