![Challenge Entry: YESTOAV vs NOTOAV [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
The local council guy dropped some propaganda through the letterbox this morning.
With slightly different photos their argument is a bit less convincing...

With slightly different photos their argument is a bit less convincing...

From the YESTOAV vs NOTOAV challenge. See all 114 entries (closed)
( , Sun 17 Apr 2011, 9:32, archived)

gave me a headache. Still no idea how it works. First past the post seems like a sneaky way of getting rid of those pesky actual votes (while maintaining a government that isn't stuck like the US one once every couple of years).
( ,
Sun 17 Apr 2011, 9:41,
archived)

Quite a staggeringly poor knowledge of history there: the Nazis came first in 1933 but still had to form a coalition government. There was no Italian election in 1922 - Mussolini seized power in a coup. There was no Russian elections either - only appointments made by the Communist party and Stalin didn't have control until 1927.
( ,
Sun 17 Apr 2011, 11:53,
archived)

In my defence I claim artistic license
(It sounds much better than ignorance)
Oh, and the queen of England is still Enid Blyton - right?
( ,
Sun 17 Apr 2011, 14:43,
archived)
(It sounds much better than ignorance)
Oh, and the queen of England is still Enid Blyton - right?

But I have to admit the No to AV campaign noticeably likes the sports analogies.
( ,
Sun 17 Apr 2011, 11:57,
archived)