
The overcontrast gives a very surreal feeling to the shot, almost like a painting. The red of the pram is such a great contrast to the earthtones of the landscape and the vivid blue of the sea.
Very nice.
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:21,
archived)
Very nice.


Thanks, I hate the voice
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:48,
archived)

This'll soothe you.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=towd9vZWDJg
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:51,
archived)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=towd9vZWDJg

somehow, I actually looked past the shadows but now you've said it, all I can see are the shadows. Photoshoppery is in order.
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:49,
archived)

Now you want me to 'shop the fucker? I was sitting here happy that people liked it the way it was!
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:54,
archived)

I don't believe in doing things to actual photos that you couldn't do in an actual darkroom. Shadows are shadows and there isn't to much you can do. It looks real and beautiful but its a little distracting now I've been told to stare at them.
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:56,
archived)

is the corgi like one of those american pickups with a hot tub in the back?
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 11:04,
archived)

*wipes all kinds of laughter-induced substances out of eyes, screen and keyboard*
You forgot to compo this winning image.
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 11:05,
archived)
You forgot to compo this winning image.

superb
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 12:19,
archived)

I now wish I had loads of equally-good photos to spill out on flickr, but no. That's the best photo I've ever taken, by a country mile.
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:48,
archived)

this is the awesomeness of digital, you can take a hundred and only get one good shot but because there are no expensive processing fees, it all seems worth it. I barely even pick up my me super or k1000 anymore becuse it costs so much for the paper and to hire the university darkroom. When I can afford all the bits though, I'm fitting out my study with my own darkroom.
Incase you are interested though, theis is my Flickr, which I haven't updated in ages. I don't think I've even shown it to anyone before.
www.flickr.com/photos/jlmeehan/
edit: now I remember 1. why I hated the kit lens and 2. why I should've been shooting raw.
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:54,
archived)
Incase you are interested though, theis is my Flickr, which I haven't updated in ages. I don't think I've even shown it to anyone before.
www.flickr.com/photos/jlmeehan/
edit: now I remember 1. why I hated the kit lens and 2. why I should've been shooting raw.

You've clearly got a fondness for low angles, vanishing-point perspective, and other ways in which architects wished people regarded their environments.
*clix*
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 11:02,
archived)
*clix*

but these photos would have come out much better had I not been pretending that trying to shoot no-flash and no-tripod at night was a good idea.
As for the vanishing point perspective, I did photography GCSE and A level and my teacher was insistant that following lines was the only way to shoot and therefore everything I take has an all too prescribed feel.
I'm glad you like them though.
( ,
Sun 8 May 2011, 11:09,
archived)
As for the vanishing point perspective, I did photography GCSE and A level and my teacher was insistant that following lines was the only way to shoot and therefore everything I take has an all too prescribed feel.
I'm glad you like them though.