
but there's a LOT of public comment, trending comment, being aimed against Murdoch et al with only guesswork, supposition, and an attitude of 'baiting' the big guns. It's purporting scandalous conspiracy theories
to appeal to the general mood against News Corp. and a lot of it has no foundation. It's not a great (or effective) way of going after the C*nt and his companies
( ,
Tue 19 Jul 2011, 12:22,
archived)
to appeal to the general mood against News Corp. and a lot of it has no foundation. It's not a great (or effective) way of going after the C*nt and his companies

Oh wait that was last year.
( ,
Tue 19 Jul 2011, 12:30,
archived)

Forensics didn't get there until 2100BST.
Nothing suspicious here, no, no. Sleep quietly, good citizens, your government is in control.
( ,
Tue 19 Jul 2011, 12:39,
archived)
Nothing suspicious here, no, no. Sleep quietly, good citizens, your government is in control.

but pushing for the scandalous option straight off with little to no backing doesn't help matters in determining truth,
and essentially comes back to some people finding something dodgy in it because they want to find something dodgy in it.
( ,
Tue 19 Jul 2011, 12:45,
archived)
and essentially comes back to some people finding something dodgy in it because they want to find something dodgy in it.