I've never been able to understand what there is about this sort of imagery that some people find interesting or appealing. This isn't a criticism of it--just a lack of understanding on my part.
(,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:39,
archived)
done poorly, it's just bad.
but it's never, ever cubism.
(,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:42,
archived)
but it's never, ever cubism.
I can see no standard for what is "done well."
(,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:47,
archived)
I don't know that there is an objective answer, but you could couch it in use of line, colour, originality.
edit: the line/color thing I relate to totally.
(,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 7:58,
archived)
(,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 8:04,
archived)
(question withdrawn without resolution or fanfare)
(,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 8:19,
archived)
I think all human knowledge is fallible, thanks to subjective perception, so what we have is a socially negotiated belief system.
What we can express with certainty is our personal preferences, whether we think we know why we like something, or can't explain it at all.
(,
Thu 1 Sep 2011, 9:39,
archived)
What we can express with certainty is our personal preferences, whether we think we know why we like something, or can't explain it at all.