The Italians have a history of "detecting" gravitational waves
This interpretation wouldn't at all surprise me. I"m slightly surprised it's not been made yet. It might be that the wave would be of far too small an amplitude to account for this - after all, it's roughly a 60 foot difference, I think (60ns at the speed of light). That would be one motherfucker of a gravitational wave.
( ,
Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:04,
archived)
perhaps a passing inverse tachyon field
interfered with the neutron?
( ,
Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:05,
archived)
So it's a *sentient* inverse tachyon beam?
I see.
I was meaning the Pauli exclusion principle. Neutrinos *are* fermions.
( ,
Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:11,
archived)
I was meaning the Pauli exclusion principle. Neutrinos *are* fermions.
:(
That's only because I keep forgetting to buy toilet paper or change my boxers :(
( ,
Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:14,
archived)
Our minds are focused on higher matters than your Earthly "clean underwear"
( ,
Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:20,
archived)