b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10546595 (Thread)

# Or a gravity wave
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:02, archived)
# The Italians have a history of "detecting" gravitational waves
This interpretation wouldn't at all surprise me. I"m slightly surprised it's not been made yet. It might be that the wave would be of far too small an amplitude to account for this - after all, it's roughly a 60 foot difference, I think (60ns at the speed of light). That would be one motherfucker of a gravitational wave.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:04, archived)
# perhaps a passing inverse tachyon field
interfered with the neutron?
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:05, archived)
# there's laws against that kind of thing
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:08, archived)
# STICK YOUR PRIME DIRECTIVE UP YOUR DARK NEBULA!
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:10, archived)
# So it's a *sentient* inverse tachyon beam?
I see.

I was meaning the Pauli exclusion principle. Neutrinos *are* fermions.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:11, archived)
# yes, but... but... YOU SMELL OF POO!
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:13, archived)
# :(
That's only because I keep forgetting to buy toilet paper or change my boxers :(
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:14, archived)
# Scientists! Tch!
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:14, archived)
# Our minds are focused on higher matters than your Earthly "clean underwear"
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:20, archived)
# and our Earthly 'sex'
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:21, archived)
# Damn it, Jim, I'm a physicist, not a biologist
You can't expect me to know everything!
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:25, archived)
# let me introduce you to a lovely girl I know
You do like green don't you...
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 11:34, archived)