indeed
a small child could also electrocute themselves with it as small childs are wont to do!
( ,
Sun 25 Sep 2011, 21:20,
archived)
Mind you,
if the child is that small, it ought also to be behind protective glass to prevent harm to slightly-bigger-but-orally-curious children.
( ,
Sun 25 Sep 2011, 21:22,
archived)
ok so
we should have a child encased in an oxygen free environment to prevent it going off, with a glass cover to be opened in case of emergency
similarly, we should have a larger child to operate a hammer to let out the smaller child.
the hammer should be stored separately behind it's own glass (so as the larger child cannot use it in an erroneous or mischievous manner) away from the larger child who would again be stored behind glass in a protective gaseous environment.
Thus, the large hammer to release the small hammer to use to release the child releasing hammer and also the large child whom upon release is given the child releasing hammer in order to release the small child.
The duration of this hammer mode transfer and child multiple release should be sufficient to allow the aircraft to crash effectively.
( ,
Sun 25 Sep 2011, 21:25,
archived)
similarly, we should have a larger child to operate a hammer to let out the smaller child.
the hammer should be stored separately behind it's own glass (so as the larger child cannot use it in an erroneous or mischievous manner) away from the larger child who would again be stored behind glass in a protective gaseous environment.
Thus, the large hammer to release the small hammer to use to release the child releasing hammer and also the large child whom upon release is given the child releasing hammer in order to release the small child.
The duration of this hammer mode transfer and child multiple release should be sufficient to allow the aircraft to crash effectively.
Yep, that about covers it
Except for the fact that the hammers may contain nuts
( ,
Sun 25 Sep 2011, 21:44,
archived)