b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10574351 (Thread)

# It's pretty relevant to Christians,
I don't know why atheists go to such lengths to make such a point because the existence of Jesus the man is hardly proof of the whole of Christian doctrine.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2011, 17:01, archived)
# But Christians do spend a lot of time pinning their entire doctrine
on the belief that a bloke name Jesus existed as if that was proof in of itself even though there is no hard evidence to say he did exists and respected historians do name a few other people who at the same time and the same region proclaimed themselves as The Messiah or Prophet of God.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2011, 17:07, archived)
# I don't much care for what this sort of Christian gets up to, to be honest,
but respected historians generally accept the historical existence of Jesus as a person based on the evidence that exists. Yes there were other Messiah claimants, if anything these lend the story essential credibility.
(, Mon 17 Oct 2011, 17:16, archived)