
they assumed people might actually be focused on the bigger urgent issues rather than what logo was on their bloody packed lunch or if they stay in the tent overnight. silly hipsters
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 12:00,
archived)

if you're trying to make a change, then you're trying to change hearts and minds. If you're of a similar mindset, you aren't going to care because it's the message that matters.
To those whose minds they are trying to change, they'll be looking for any reason to discount this act as just whinging hippiness, because people inherently fear change unless they are the ones driving it.
If they don't think that, as "ambassadors" for their cause, they aren't being watched like hawks by those willing to twist it around, then they are naive!
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 12:04,
archived)
To those whose minds they are trying to change, they'll be looking for any reason to discount this act as just whinging hippiness, because people inherently fear change unless they are the ones driving it.
If they don't think that, as "ambassadors" for their cause, they aren't being watched like hawks by those willing to twist it around, then they are naive!

do you have any evidence for these conclusions you've drawn then?
I mean you've obviously been down there and spoken to each individual protestor, found out what each of them is protesting and has issue with and then inspected the contents of their lunchbox matching it up to their individual issue by the sounds of it
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:28,
archived)
I mean you've obviously been down there and spoken to each individual protestor, found out what each of them is protesting and has issue with and then inspected the contents of their lunchbox matching it up to their individual issue by the sounds of it

you've posted three lines of absolutely fuck all...
it's simple sweetheart:
1) pick a point
2) run with it
it's not hard
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:45,
archived)
it's simple sweetheart:
1) pick a point
2) run with it
it's not hard

you seem ok with calling them all stupid and other generalisations, implying they're hypocritical without even knowing which are actually anti-capitalist protestors or which ones are just protesting change within the financial sector. and try not to take it so personally, its only a debate, chill
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:49,
archived)

because I have not been down to St. Pauls and met every single one of these protestors, I'm not allowed to have an opinion on any proportion (small or large) of said protestors' lacking the strength of their convictions...
( ,
Wed 26 Oct 2011, 13:55,
archived)